告密者

制片人希望能让观众受到片中那些被迫卖淫女性受到残暴对待的镜头影响，所以增加了拉亚一角，来给予这些受害人一张真实的面孔。

电影首次在多伦多放映期间，一位观众因片中的暴力镜头晕倒，大部分强奸的镜头因此遭到删减。

对此薇兹表示：我完全理解，让人看这些东西的确太痛苦了。

真实情况还要惨烈得多。

我的意思是，第一个接触这些青年女性的人的故事中我能够告诉你的还只有这个“低调”的版本，如果你能够接受这样的内容。

不过，这不是纪录片，你不希望（在里面）毁掉谁。

你只想阐明一些事情，它的实际情况还要惨上百倍。

联合国秘书长潘基文主持了电影的一次放映，并承诺会采取措施，防止联合国工作人员参与色情人口贩卖活动。

对此波克瓦克回应：“不幸的是，恐惧已经广泛散布。

纠正之路将会很复杂，并且无法速战速决。

”她还表示，除波斯尼亚外，维和人员在尼日利亚、科索沃、布隆迪、塞拉利昂、刚果、利比里亚、柬埔寨、伊拉克、阿富汗、海地、哥伦比亚、几内亚和苏丹都存在侵犯人权的行径。

康达基对此表示自己打算保持乐观，希望电影的放映能够“让人们对联合国参与性交易人口贩卖及其它犯罪活动展开真正的讨论和思考。

”但她也担心电影可能不会产生预期的持久影响：“我知道我们会听到很多说法，说自本片上映以来都已经采该了哪些措施，但到目前为止这些都还只是说辞。

实际情况已经出现升级。

”《告密者》在院线上映后，《卫报》报道称有联合国官员试图淡化电影中描绘的事件，并且打击波斯尼亚境内人口贩卖的行动已遭中止。

戴阳国际发言人阿什利·伯克（Ashley Burke）称：我没看过那部电影，所以无法对其内容作出评价，但是我可能告诉大家，我们联系影片发行商试图了解电影的更多信息时得知，影片不是改编自波克瓦克女士的著作，而是是受到她经历启发所做的‘虚构戏剧化呈现’。

我们也没有威胁采取法律行动来要求他们不得在片中使用公司的真实名称。

很抱歉，以上是我转载的内容，我觉得这更有一定的说服力首先，电影里出现的公司名称戴阳国际是真实存在的，并且戴阳国际也一直在参与联合国的各种事物（业务），最终联合国秘书长潘也组织观看了此片，相信会有所动作！

但.....弱肉抢食

Talking With Kathryn Bolkovac About Her Experience as The WhistleblowerPosted: 08/16/11 07:48 PM ETAfter seeing (and reviewing) The Whistleblower, I contacted Kathryn Bolkovac, whose story is the basis of the movie, and interviewed her. Her answers speak for themselves, but also give such a sense of her persona, grit and determination.FOSTER: You were faced with a situation where the people you worked with were engaged in something very shocking. Do you have any insight as to how or why they got involved with trafficking?I really do not think there is clear cut answer for this. Everyone is an individual and is accountable to their individual behavior and potential illegal actions they committed and continue to commit in current missions. I think most people are truly just plain complicit in their thinking and tend to not get involved or look the other way to avoid any form of accountability, especially if they think that something does not directly affect them for their position. Then there is the group of people who can easily be swayed to join in on a pack mentality, who are morally and mentally weak or ignorant. When conditions are right as they have been and still are in many overseas missions around the world, or if they think they will not be caught or judged then it is easy for them to engage in illegal and corrupt behavior. They try to justify and minimize their actions. Finally, there are individuals who are just plain evil and corrupt, they see the money making potential of preying on the helpless and needy, and exploit every opportunity they can to make a buck, especially in an industry that involves sex. They are very good at dehumanizing, denial, and lying about what is going on. FOSTER: What do you think needs to be done to address the trafficking issue? What can government do?The trafficking issue at large is too complex to tackle with sweeping reform. There are so many different types of human trafficking each with different dynamics of funding the corruption. Obviously, many adults choose to be trafficked... or illegally transported across many borders to escape horrendous conditions in their own countries. These issues cannot be convoluted with organized criminal syndicates who are providing services to internationals all over the world, in the form of trafficking for forced prostitution. They are involved in the recruitment, abuse, desensitization, and sale of human flesh, into international missions as sex workers. This is what I want to discuss and what I think we can make a huge impact on based on my experiences as a former law enforcement officer, former UN employee, former representative of our U.S. government overseas, and as a former employee of one of the largest private government contractors in the world DynCorp. FOSTER: What can our government do?First, in the short term, the United States needs to take a serious look at why we are willing to allow private companies to engage in the profession of law enforcement. Government contractors are a needed and viable means to get many logistical and re-construction efforts accomplished. They are not a viable means for a protection force or as a mechanism for the use in training law enforcement officers in emerging democracies. Law enforcement is not a business. Policing is a calling. Does anyone really believe that private corporations are in this policing and operational mission business for anything but the money? We need to set an example with our own federal police selection units, perhaps via the Department of Justice as an example, why can we not recruit and most importantly train our own community police officers before we send them into these missions? My book accurately describes the pathetic training offered by the private company who sent me overseas, which I am sure was heavily subsidized with my tax dollars. It was a disgrace; none of us had even the minimum knowledge or idea of what we were supposed to be doing once we got into Bosnia.If we are to continue to send "rent a cops " overseas with inadequate knowledge and inadequate protections from corrupt private companies, some of whom had serious questionable policing backgrounds we might want to stop and think about how this damages our reputation and our goals. The private company who fired me had free reign to treat me however they saw fit, no one was in authority to stop them. They were exempt from all U.S. government accountability and have never been held accountable for what they did to me to this day. How has this changed? It has not. Second, get the Civilian Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (CEJA) out of committee and get it passed. It has been more than 12 years overdue. [NOTE: CEJA would allow the U.S. Justice Department to prosecute government contractors and employees for certain crimes committed overseas. It would complement the Military Extraterritorial Jurisdiction Act (MEJA), which provides similar criminal jurisdiction over Department of Defense employees and contractors but does not clearly apply to U.S. contractors working overseas for other federal agencies.]Third, make government contractors accountable for their employee actions, by putting a clause in their contracts that require them to facilitate and allow oversight of both external and internal investigations by outside government agencies, when probable cause exists that employees are suspected, or implicated in criminal offenses. They must cooperate in the facilitation of prosecutions. They can no longer just fire people, and hope the problem goes away, which automatically curtails any further investigation. Fourth, set examples by having the means available to prosecute and convict with meaningful sentences. FOSTER: What can individuals do?Learn, read, report, and stop burying your heads in the sand. Many of the people involved in these crimes could be your next door neighbor. Get local law enforcement initiatives started, and ask your police chiefs this question. What kind of training is being offered to your new recruits and officers on the streets to recognize and investigate all forms of human trafficking?Do you think a local police chief in the hills of Northern New Mexico, or in the farming community of southern Illinois, is even going to know what we are talking about? Does the local hotel have young female Hispanics working in the housekeeping department? They do not speak English, they have no documents, does he know what wage they are being paid and in what form? Think about it. I have been in these places have you?FOSTER: Many of the women and girls who are trafficked are promised jobs that don't materialize. What do you think would be effective to get the word out to them so that fewer of them fall prey to these types of promises?The only effect we can have on this is to stop the demand. FOSTER: How did you sustain yourself? Continued faith in our justice system, lots of hard workouts and sweat, many tears and my husband would make me a strong gin tonic with lots of lemon and ice once in a while.Follow Stephenie Foster on Twitter: www.twitter.com/StephenieFoster

告密者我是在B站看的，同時有許多彈幕伴隨，有的在劇透，有的在高能預警，有的在解釋事件背景，有的在罵女主角空有滿腔熱情不懂得理智待人。

對於這樣的評論，我只用一個細節便說服了自己它依舊是部好電影——在女主角一直想拯救的被拐女孩萊雅因為曾經的告密而最終被妓女酒吧老闆一槍爆頭之後，她開始沈思，反省，終於意識到自己的正義感在利益團體面前微不足道。

拋開具體的時代背景，類似的事情一遍又一遍的發生在這個世界上，擷取任何一個片段，都可以找出許多類似的故事。

而我要講的，可能和這部片子的劇情並沒有太多關係。

看的時候，有很多人留下一些其中有一句飄過屏幕的話引起我的注意：“可以看看聶樹斌案。

”聶樹斌是誰？

抱著好奇心我記下了他的名字。

從電影的故事情節看，也許又是一個官官相護體制下的得利者或犧牲者吧。

影片結束，我讀完女主角在真實世界裡那平淡而不出所料的結局（無法再復職），便進入聶樹斌和翻案刑警鄭成月的人生。

有興趣的朋友可以看看冷暖人生對鄭成月的採訪（http://news.ifeng.com/a/20161207/50377287_0.shtml）。

與女主類似，鄭成月在某一天被辭去局長的位子，給年輕人讓了機會。

我漸漸從聶樹斌案生出一絲對法律的真切感受，這是與在公司工作時接觸商法完全不同的感受。

法理人情，終於還是人占重頭，想要約束的時候，法似如來神掌；倘若想要無法無天，那真是自甘墮落為瞎子。

也因而我們還是脫離不了、也不能拋棄用道德來壓制邪念的途徑。

看完此案，我又輾轉搜索到了“山区人民告诉你，被拐卖到深山给人当老婆逃跑可能性有多大”。

這便是互聯網的力量，跑題不談。

最後的最後，雖然民主幾乎已經成為一個貶義詞了，但B站也許可以成為公共討論的新場所，激盪出新一批擁有共情與理性的新公民吧。

由一个女性角色做绝对主角的电影，并不容易赢得票房，除非制片和监制对女演员的号召力有绝对的信心。

即使在好莱坞，这样的女演员也实在不多，在Julia Roberts和Angelina Julie把持这项殊荣数年以后，Rachel Weisz现在也迈入这个行列了。

又是个根据真实事件改编的电影，角色的名字也跟现实人物的名字一字不差。

看过以后，实在是对联合国所代表的国际政治和人性失去了所有的信任，所有潜规则的存在自然有他的道理，但是最应该抱着普世价值观的人都只是在被利益所驱使，所有的条条框框反而成了他们的借口，这个世界还有什么可以信任的？

所有的犯案者，都能全身而退。

而抱着信念而且敢于抗争的女主角，最终没能救人于水火，却只能在荷兰隐居。

像波斯尼亚这样的泥潭，地球上还有不少，战争让只想安身立命的普通人活得那么艰难，而绝大多数的战争都只是在争夺利益，无论是金钱、资源、人口还是思想的统治权。

能够活在一个和平的社会里，聊以自慰吧。

我们的世界坏至如此，没有一个人是无辜的。

力荐此片，真实改编而来。

人与制度的纠葛或许要贯穿整个人类文明的始终，没有绝对的公平，但必须有一个相互牵制的权利分配和制衡机制——即便它不完善。

有一颗还会流泪的心在，人性即不灭。

新闻是所有博弈的最后一条路，一个连新闻都没有的地方，所谓司法、正义、公平便是皇帝的新装。

那些为此新装沉默的人们，你怎么敢说自己是无辜的？

你怎么敢说你还有温暖的人性盛装在你灵魂深处？

你还以为在路边给乞丐抛几个零钱就能赎罪、丢叠钞票就代表的善良如初吗？

NO！

或许你仅仅是需要借此行为装饰自己的优雅和高贵，而人性已然逃离于你言不由衷、裹得热乎发烫的躯壳之外，在瑟瑟寒风中濒临死亡。

而在中国这片神奇的土地上，它们作为一个复数已近濒临灭绝。

——《告密者》观后。

B站观看的112分钟版本。

影片代入感很强，像是一部纪录片。

本片根据真实事件改编，根据在联合国担当维和人员的凯瑟琳·波克瓦克的真实经历改编。

讲述女主陷入一桩丑闻事件的种种遭遇。

影片线索复杂，充满政治隐喻色彩。

讲述联合国维和人员的丑闻。

美好表面粉饰之下的丑陋，实是普通人难以想像得到。

以一己之力对抗整个机构，如同蚍蜉撼树，最终还是借助媒体的力量才得以曝光，但却没有人而此获罪！

主题沉重和复杂，而创作者的真诚同样也表露无遗，影片绝不是一部哗众取宠抑或粉饰太平之作。

如今大多的生活都被消遣和娱乐取代，我们也越来越多的活在被粉饰的太平中。

所以本片注定只会极少的出现，毕竟这是部与天下大同完全背道而驰的电影，很多幸福的人会本能地拒绝承受过多此类比新闻类节目更具观赏性也更具侵略性的故事。

正义的力量在庞大的恶势力面前微乎其微，当一个人或者一个群体手中掌有足够的资源时，就可以凌驾于法治之上。

这部电影确实让人深感愤怒和无奈！

看完这部治郁片2个关键词：Democra security；trafficker2个感悟：感动于Girls help girls；同时深知权利约束的重要性能探究到的黑暗，从来都是冰山的一个角，这种恶超越了国界和国籍，是人性光辉的对立面。

女主大部分时间都没有笑过，唯一的笑容是面对女上司表面坚定追查下去的时候，以一人之力对抗世界。

纵观那些被我们知晓了的恶，正是他们无名英雄历经千难险阻披露出来的，其中遭遇的种种难以估量。

弹幕里还有指责莱雅叛逆遭此罪的，不去怪施暴者，反而受难者有罪论？

首先这部电影在pptv的蓝光视频里，这样你们就可以容易找到。

这部电影是真人真事。

关于剧情，辗转反侧的内容，让眼睛和大脑不停的运作，本来以为是光明前的黑暗，原来是越来越琢磨不透的阴森。

然后让我们看看作为世界联合国，他们主要负责的事项, 我简单的摘要了一下 “联合国、各方案和基金以及专门机构组成“联合国系统”。

作为联合国组织的大家庭，联合国执行涉及我们每个人方方面面的多种任务。

这些任务既包括安全理事会为应对某一争端决定派遣维持和平行动，也包括制定航空安全和通信兼容性的标准； 既包括向自然灾害受害者迅速调运紧急用品，也包括协调对付艾滋病流行的工作；既包括帮助各国举行自由公正选举，也包括为较穷国家基础设施发展争取低息贷款提供担保。

归根结底，联合国的工作是要创造一个更健康、更稳定的世界，增进我们人人享有的机会和正义（见www.unsystem.org）”剧中的女主角就是为了完成这些事情然后去不同国家帮助他人的其中一只小蚂蚁，不出所料的是，一群男人的里边，只有2个女人在做这样的事情，没有女生愿意做这样的工作，一年的很多时间飞来飞去，每天穿着制服，当女主角问她另外的一个女同事为什么做这个，那个女孩说，因为不需要大学毕业成绩，听说还能挣很多钱。

电影是讲人口贩卖的，一个多少年来一直存在的问题，看到影片中那些年轻的女孩被泯灭人性的欺凌，手无寸铁的她们让我揪心，她一个联合国中的一个小蚂蚁，想要拯救这些女孩们，重重的阻碍，不光使她丢掉了工作，还造成了其中一个女孩子的死亡。

女人在那里，或者说在很多地方是不被看重的，丈夫的打虐，其他男人的不尊重，等等。

现在我的心情还是久久不能平静，无法平静下来不光是看到一部真人真事的电影，而且在电影最后 这个女人最后也没有能回到联合国上班，为什么一个人只是想伸张正义，努力的用自己的真心去工作，却那样难？

她一直没有哭，直到她看着其中被拐卖一个女孩，她伸出手对那个女孩说“ 别怕，你就只要说你想离开，你是安全的。

” 她不停的说，泪也不停的落下来。

女孩最后哭着说“no“ 她颤抖着躲到了那个连狗都不会住的房间里。

到底真相是什么，电影为我们留下了问号。

看到这些，我们应该做什么？

最后是一些电影的台词。

"We say in this nation that we are looking for people with honesty, integrity, drive and dedication, and then when we find such people, we take them out and whip them." -anonymous whistleblower“You may have to fight a battle more than once to win it.” -Margaret Thatcher"Don't let it end like this. Tell them I said something." -Pancho Villa"We hold our heads high, despite the price we have paid, because freedom is priceless." -Lech Walesa

看过之后，感触颇深，在现实生活中，我们原以为的世界，是和平的公正的，但是这种现象可能只存在于你的国度，通过影片，我们知道原来世界并不如你想像的那样，原来人性也不如你想像的那样，当你感受到那是一种非人类所能干出的事情，却被很多人干了，当你以为世界女性在新世纪的社会地位有所提升时，你却被现实所打败，根据真实事件改编，现实是如此的残酷，人性被无情的践踏，所谓的世界和平卫士，在背地里干着破坏和平的事情，当有人想打破这一现状时，才发现，不是上级不知道，而是上级从一开始都知道，这难道不是在讽刺吗？

所有的一切源于纵容，在公众的心中，这个机构是如此的为人民着想，为世界着想，但背面却是如此的肮脏与不堪，这部影片在暗讽但也在警示，不要欺骗我们，因为秘密不会永远都是秘密。

同时，这其中也有女权思想，女性被贩卖呗迫害，为什么男性没有，这是影片所表达的，人人都应收到尊重，人人都应该平等的活在这个世界上。

看到电影后半段越来越感觉到痛心，当权利自然得达到利益的互相节点后，便默许了一些罪恶的联盟，更玷污的是还穿着制服打着正义的旗号，关键的是人人都知道是错误，而为了自保都硬是要排挤真正的正义，我不知道为什么，看到让那些被拐卖的女人作证劝说过来的时候，拉雅看着背后那些光顾他们的制服客人时，不是愤怒而是害怕，最终逃走的命运是死在枪口之下，我终于明白了恐惧的心理才是麻醉一个人的良方，我同样不知道为什么，当时我想到的是火烧圆明园，3万的所谓八国联军，在我泱泱大国面前可以横冲直撞，而今天所有的主流媒体再介绍的时候都是谴责，或说清政府的无能，为何不深究深层次的问题？

火烧圆明园，为何我国民众不爱国阻止了呢？

这也许就是出于拉雅的恐惧，对衙门的不信任，对列强的害怕，如果我再说，火烧后，夷为平地的是周围的居民，又会有何感想呢？

麻木的教育是人们没有了独立思考的能力，沦为宋、明一样的子民，然后再给元、清冠上少数民族了以安慰内心，呵呵。

唉，说得有点跑题了。