Christopher & Leslie:"Doesn't work like that, Christopher. Love is not negotiable.""Oh baby. Everything is negotiable.""No, not love. Not love. Love is a guessing game. And that's the beauty of it. There's no guarantee. It's like, diving into a pool of water without knowing if it's shallow or deep. And sure yeah, if shallow you may end up hurt and paralyze from the neck down. But if it's deep, you know, it's a loop of faith. It's like, throwing yourself out there without any guarantees. Dude, that's what life is about. Ok, you know those carnival games? And you know some of them are really hard to win and some of them are super easy and everyone wins?""Sure.""That's the difference between love and sex. Sex is the game where everyone wins a little prize and no one goes home a loser. And love is the game that it's really hard to win. But if you do, and you get to take home that life-size stuffed rhinoceros. It feels a whole lot better than taking home a cheap plastic key chain."
2012-09-16电影不长,连上前后字幕都只是80分钟而已,对于一部短篇电影集之类的电影来说,显得单薄了一点。
或许很多抱着色情片来看的人会有些许失望,相比很多大片,这部一点都没有露的电影实在太干净了。
7个片段,7对恋人,异性恋4对,其中包括了1对少年男女的初次和一对老年人对疯狂岁月的回味;男同2对;女同1对。
男同渐渐有了主流的味道,或许是因为有越来越多勇敢的男人出柜。
而女同的两个角色都算是明星,这也让电影的各个片段显得平衡。
3人游戏之类的没有被放上银幕,导演还是有些妥协。
第一段的场景在世界各地每天都在发生,因为有了承诺的味道,让成年人说一句“我爱你”真的好难。
女人的表白“性是一种游戏,参与者都会获得小小的奖励,没有输家;而爱呢,却都很难获胜”,这番理论的正确与否,难以评断,性、爱、婚姻、家庭,这些概念本没有办法划清界限。
少男少女那段,我觉得很温馨,没有比这更好的方式走入新的人生阶段。
母亲的处理方式非常好,女儿让男孩鼓起勇气走过她老妈的面前,把三个人的尴尬轻松化解,这个女孩继承了母亲的超高EQ。
当然,还有几乎所有角色的坦诚,迷惘也罢、下贱也好、肉欲本来就是很自然的事情,不应该被唾弃,不应该成为恩赐,也不应该成为条件。
最后的那一段,西班牙男人拿着手枪(或者称作是打火机)把玩的时候,我已经猜到会是那个结局。
那个以为西班牙是墨西哥一部分的美国姑娘未能免俗,在心仪的男人面前试图掩饰自己的身份,唯一的不坦诚带来了无尽的苦果。
看,总是不清楚到底是电影误导我们还是生活误导我们众多杂志以及网络的普及男人们告诉我们xxoo会浪费多少的体力爽过之后哪里还有精力和耐心和你说话事后烟或者蒙头大睡可是可是可是整个影片围绕的可不是哦全部都是两个人事后的各种交谈聊性和爱的区别以及看谁先说爱和一场博弈一样爱可不像在床上谁能让谁gc一样简单两个初试云雨的孩子尴尬的聊着彼此的感觉聊到底谁应该是男人谁应该是女人聊曾经的战绩辉煌历史甚至聊到彼此的职业聊到同性恋恐惧症......这个片面有另外的翻译是做爱后动物感伤动物才不会像人如此纠结呢感伤毛啊人类会感伤才对而且感伤的大部分是女人---另我觉得这个编剧是个话唠都唠出来应召女郎第一次什么的了
"Love is not negotiable.Love is a guessing game,and that’s the beauty of it.There are no guarantees.It’s like diving into a pool of waterwithout knowing if its shallow or deepand sure [yeah] if its shallow you end uphurt and paralyzed from the neck down,but if it's deep…[you know] it's a leap of faith…its like throwing yourself out there withoutany guarantees, and that’s what life’s about.You know those carnival games,you know how some of them are really hard to winand those that are super easy and everyone winswell… that’s the difference between love and sexSex is the game where everyone wins a little prizeand no one goes home a loserand Love is the game that’s really hard to win.but if you do and you get to take home thatlife size stuffed rhinocerosand it feels a whole lot better than takinghome that little shitty plastic key chain."What is love? Who can specify it? Except falling in love at the first sight, does love exist in other forms?Maybe it's when love exists in other forms that it's so difficult for us to admit or to know that we love the other.Sex and love are separable, but sex and love are blended for the people in the stories of this movie. That's why after sex they argued or talked so much. The old couple wanted so much to tell their happy and wild sex they had in their younger days to their children, but they were afraid their children wouldn't be able to accpept it. They weren't sure how their children would react to it. We, as children, date, fool around, have sex behind parents. The experiences may be good, or bad. But whether it's good or bad, we want so much to share them with our parents just as the old couple wanted to share with their children. If it's good, we want to share the happiness with them; if it's bad, we wish we could turn to them for company. But we dare not to tell them. We conceal the experiences we care most from the ones whom we want to confide to most. We and our parents cannot open our hearts to each other. Who should be blamed for this? Why can't we take sex naturally and admit all types of sex? We all hate to be constrained by moral rules and social codes, but they are made by us. Why we human beings torture ourselves?
虽然是说sex,但很多是关于love的讨论。
关于为什么要上床的问题,关于sex如何让人们认清自己,找到真实的自我的问题。
一切谈话,都过于暧昧了。
如果不那么暧昧的话,会好一点。
这些谈话都是在情人之间或者sex buddy之间进行的,似乎所谈论的都是关乎心理的,而不涉及sex本身的质量。
难道质量就不重要么?
我想这个电影应该是很小成本的电影。
对于一个没有特效,没有故事情节,只有talk的电影来说,如果拍的比写小说散文还烂,那就真的不应该了。
假如影像不能表现自己想说的话的话,那还不如选择用文字表达。
看完了全片通篇感觉不错,就是在结尾的时候,妓女揭示自己身份说明枪不是真枪了,之后男人开枪枪响了。
谎言套着谎言,说的谎言多了让人分不清哪个是谎言,哪个又是事实。
最后的结局便是如此。
看是枪杀的是剧中人,其实便是那些属于心理不成熟类型的看客自己。
即上了婊子,又怕婊子影响了自己的健康。
最后婊子说自己不是婊子也能轻易的相信,这样的人不是心理不成熟还能是什么类型呢。
而那个妓女,就是导演导演出来的一出戏。
你信它也好,不信也罢,别像个傻子一样的贻笑大方就可以了。
傻的看客,尽管用枪去崩自己的头去吧。
看到verycd上有下载,忍不住重新下下来,又看了一遍。
多好的电影啊。
假如我是教育部长,一定会强烈推荐给全国高校的学生,作为大学期间必看电影之一,看完还要写心得体会,开班会集体讨论。
又或者,如果我能遇到机器猫,我会要它用时间机器带我回到上世纪90年代,去某个中学校园,找到某个为超重烦恼,为体育考试烦恼,无聊的时候爱哼一首奇怪的歌的小孩。
我会告诉他,喂,小孩,虽然《出路》是一首很酷的歌,可是将来很多很多的问题,哼歌也解决不了的。
所以我把这张碟给你,当你遇到头疼问题的时候,你看看这张碟里的电影就好了。
可是,当我和机器猫飞回21世纪,我突然想起来,糟糕,我忘了送他一台电脑了!
。。
挺逗的。。。
一对GAY。。
的那个片段。。
people have to face what he or she really is 。。
可是。。
总是不愿意承认。。
最后一对乐死人了。。
好玩。。
1 love. expectation. responsibility2 Gay. Straight被忽悠成Gay3 第一次。
还被抓包4 女Gay5 老变态的自娱自乐和自我解脱6 10? 01? 11? 00? xy7 一个傻+没逻辑的女人(没看太懂)8 又一个弱智的女人 --> 原来是装傻的 哈哈
其实本片是看似有点色,但是挺严肃的探讨性的电影。
但可惜的是,美国人的性观念,距离我们中国人实在太远了。
不要说同性恋或性派对,就是看两个人刚云雨之后,还要拼命反驳我们没有爱情,极力否定我对你有感觉,就让我不可理解。
性,应该是两个人爱到浓时,无声胜有声的感情升华,那才是美好美妙的,而不是纯动物性的发泄。
我觉得好莱坞电影总在传导少年破处还很酷的理念,实在不可理喻,但又客观存在。
感觉本片对性的探讨还仅限于表面,从不同人的侧面来表现人对性、爱的观点,但只是一种反映缺乏深度的思考。
可以做爱的关系往往非常简单
欢愉之后 8373
for Mila..sort of interesting.
1,7
第一个Christopher & Leslie的故事就直接击中泪点了T T..
对话还是有点思想的。
各色男女日完B后扯淡。
史上最差youtube短片集合
有点闷
无聊话痨片。
谈话节目滥竽充数电影
还行
如果说得不好,确实还不如不说。
八个故事,偶有佳作,大都不知所云
176/300:
还挺现实的,最后那段太逗了。
不好不壞。 討論性與愛 最後一個故事最好笑。
love sex magic
好吧 也许是我看不懂....电影实在欠缺太多,如某短评所说,作业水平而已。感觉角度不错,但是某些类型的爱情or性爱却讲得不够入骨,总觉得导演不能让观众感同身受。演技....啧啧 台词...怎么感觉跟剧情对话似的...文化差异?好吧 还是觉得一切都掩盖不了它挺渣的事实....跟着推荐来看的片子有点失望
四十年前的荒唐事儿~